Search for: All records

Plate-tectonic reconstructions use rotational (Euler) poles about which plates rotate in small circle patterns, producing oceanic fracture zones. Oceanic fracture zones are contiguous with transform faults. Because oceanic lithosphere older than ~200 Ma is preferentially destroyed by subduction, pre-Mesozoic plate-tectonic reconstructions lack such constraints from oceanic fracture zones. Based on high-resolution bathymetry, geological and geophysical data, with particular emphasis on the Red Sea-Gulf of Aden system, some fracture zones are shown to be contiguous with pre-existing discontinuities in adjacent continents, while others develop parallel to those. Combined with results from existing analog and numerical models, continental rift zones and oceanic spreading ridges that are initially oblique to these discontinuities are demonstrated to evolve into orientations perpendicular to them, while fracture zones and transform faults develop parallel to them. Consequently, oceanic spreading directions, or the exact plate movement directions, are controlled by pre-existing continental lithospheric discontinuities, while other factors such as slab pull control the general direction. This hypothesis constitutes a paradigm shift, from the widespread belief that transform fault and fracture zone orientations are controlled by plate motions, to one where some are inherited from pre-existing continental discontinuities and control the exact directions of plate movements. If so, identifying such discontinuities in ancient continental lithosphere may constrain plate motions in deep geologic time. 

The southeastern New England Avalon Terrane (AT) accreted to the southeastern margin of the Nashoba Terrane (NT) at the onset of the Acadian orogeny (latest Silurian to Devonian). The NT represents the trailing edge of Ganderia. Rocks of the NT have previously been interpreted as having been extruded to the southeast over the AT as part of a channel flow zone (CFZ). Based on fold symmetries, it was inferred that only the top and center of this zone are located in the NT. Bedrock and structural mapping were carried out in the AT adjacent to the NT to test whether the bottom of the CFZ may be located in the AT. Data were collected from migmatitic biotite gneiss, mylonite, foliated quartzite, and gneiss. Structural data were divided into NE and SW domains. In the NE domain, foliations dip predominantly NW, and lineations plunge NE and SW. Migmatitic and gneissic rocks are absent in the SW domain, and orientations of mylonite zones and foliations in quartzite vary. Compared to the NE domain, rocks in the SW domain are strongly faulted and intruded by Ediacaran and late Silurian/Devonian granitic and gabbroic plutons. The presence of migmatite and consistency in structural orientations in the NE domain, and the general resemblance of structures to those in the NT make the NE domain a likely candidate to represent the bottom of the CFZ. U-Pb zircon data of the migmatitic biotite gneiss yielded a detrital zircon signature typical for Avalonia, with predominantly Mesoproterozoic and minor Paleoproterozoic and Tonian populations. Furthermore, zircon overgrowths are ~585 Ma, which suggests that high-grade metamorphism and partial melting occurred in the Ediacaran, i.e., not during the Acadian orogeny. Hence, the migmatitic biotite gneiss in the AT terrane does not represent the bottom of the CFZ. We believe that the Bloody Bluff Fault along the Nashoba-Avalon terrane boundary may have cut off the bottom of the CFZ. Our analysis is complemented by and provides context for high-resolution seismic imaging of the crust enabled by the ongoing GENESIS deployment of broadband seismometers across the NT. Preliminary results from GENESIS suggest a transition in crustal structure across the boundary between NT and AT, consistent with geological observations. 

Abstract Seismic anisotropy beneath eastern North America, as expressed in shear wave splitting observations, has been attributed to plate motion‐parallel shear in the asthenosphere, resulting in fast axes aligned with the plate motion. However, deviations of fast axes from plate motion directions are observed near major tectonic boundaries of the Appalachians, indicating contributions from lithospheric anisotropy associated with past tectonic processes. In this study, we conduct anisotropic receiver function (RF) analysis using data from a dense seismic array traversing the New England Appalachians in Connecticut to examine anisotropic layers in the crust and upper mantle and correlate them with past tectonic processes as well as present‐day mantle flow. We use the harmonic decomposition method to separate directionally‐dependent variations of RFs and focus on features with the same harmonic signals observed across multiple stations. Within the crust, there are multiple features that may be correlated with stratification in the Hartford Basin, faults in the Taconic thrust belt, shear zones formed during Salinic/Acadian terrane accretion events, and orogen‐parallel crustal flow in the Acadian orogenic plateau. We apply a Bayesian inversion method to obtain quantitative constraints on the direction and strength of intra‐crustal anisotropy beneath the Hartford Basin. In the upper mantle, we identify a fossil shear zone possibly formed during oblique subduction of Rheic Ocean lithosphere. We also find evidence for a plate motion‐parallel flow zone in the asthenosphere that is likely disturbed by mantle upwelling near the southern margin of the Northern Appalachian Anomaly in the eastern part of the study area. 

The New England Appalachians provide a fascinating window into a host of fundamental geological problems. These include the modification of crustal and mantle lithospheric structure via orogenesis, terrane accretion, and continental rifting, the evolution of individual terranes through processes such as channel flow and ductile extrusion, and the causes and consequences of the Northern Appalachian Anomaly (NAA), a prominent geophysical anomaly in the upper mantle. Recent and ongoing deployments of dense seismic arrays in New England are providing images of the crust and upper mantle in unprecedented detail, allowing us to address both new and longstanding science questions. These deployments include the Seismic Experiment for Imaging Structure beneath Connecticut (SEISConn, 2015-2019), the New England Seismic Transects (NEST, 2018-present), and the GEology of New England via Seismic Imaging Studies (GENESIS, 2022-present) arrays. Here we present results from these experiments that are shedding new light on the tectonic evolution of New England and the ways in which structures and processes in the upper mantle can affect the structure of the overlying lithosphere. These include detailed new images of crustal architecture beneath central and southern New England, including a sharp transition from thick (~48 km) crust Laurentia terranes to thin (~32 km) crust beneath Appalachian terranes. The character of this offset beneath the SEISConn and NEST arrays suggests an overlap of two Moho boundaries, forming an overthrust-type structure that may have resulted from reactivation of faults during the compression and shortening associated with the formation of the hypothesized Acadian Altiplano. Beneath SEISConn, there is evidence for multiple relict structures preserved in the lithosphere from past episodes of terrane accretion and suturing, as well as anisotropic layering that constrains the kinematics of past lithospheric deformation events. Beneath the NEST line in central New England, we infer a relatively shallow (~80 km) lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary above the NAA upper mantle geophysical anomaly, providing evidence for lithospheric thinning above a presumed asthenospheric upwelling. Finally, preliminary results suggest layered crustal anisotropy beneath the GENESIS array, perhaps corresponding to a past episode of channel flow in the mid-crust. 

The Avalon terrane of southeastern New England is a composite terrane, in which various crustal blocks may have different origins and/or tectonic histories. The northern part (west and north of Boston, Massachusetts) correlates well with Avalonian terranes in Newfoundland, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, Canada, based on rock types and ages, U–Pb detrital zircon signatures of metasedimentary rocks, and Sm–Nd isotope geochemistry data. In the south, fewer data exist, in part because of poorer rock exposure, and the origins and histories of the rocks are less well constrained. We conducted U–Pb laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) analysis on zircon from seven metasedimentary rock samples from multiple previously interpreted subterranes, in order to constrain their origins. Two samples of Neoproterozoic Plainfield Formation quartzite from the previously interpreted Hope Valley subterrane in the southwestern part of the southeastern New England Avalon terrane and two from the Neoproterozoic Blackstone Group quartzite from the adjacent Esmond-Dedham subterrane to the east have Tonian youngest detrital zircon age populations. One sample of Cambrian North Attleboro Formation quartzite of the Esmond-Dedham subterrane yielded an Ediacaran youngest detrital zircon age population. Detrital zircon populations of all five samples include abundant Mesoproterozoic zircon and smaller Paleoproterozoic and Archean populations, and are similar to those of the northern part of the southeastern New England Avalon terrane and the Avalonian terranes in Canada. These are interpreted as having a Baltican/Amazonian affinity based primarily on published U-Pb and Lu-Hf detrital zircon data. Based on U-Pb detrital zircon data, there is no significant difference between the Hope Valley and Esmond-Dedham subterranes. Detrital zircon of two samples of the Price Neck and Newport Neck formations of the Neoproterozoic Newport Group in southern Rhode Island is characterized by large ~647–643 and ~745–733 Ma age populations and minor zircon up to ~3.1 Ga. This signature is most consistent with a northwest African affinity. The Newport Group may thus represent a subterrane, terrane or other crustal block with a different origin and history than the southeastern New England Avalon terrane to the northwest. The boundary of this Newport Block may be restricted to the boundaries of the Newport Group, or it may extend as far north as Weymouth, MA, as far northwest as (but not including) the North Attleboro Formation quartzite and associated rocks in North Attleboro, MA, and as far west as Warwick, RI, where eastern exposures of the Blackstone Group quartzite exist. The Newport Block may have amalgamated with the Amazonian/Baltican part of the Avalon terrane prior to mid-Paleozoic amalgamation with Laurentia, or have arrived as a separate terrane after accretion of the Avalon terrane. Alternatively, it may have arrived during the formation of Pangea and been stranded after the breakup of Pangea, as has been proposed previously for rocks of the Georges Bank in offshore Massachusetts. If the latter is correct, then the boundary between the Newport Block and the southeastern New England Avalon terrane is the Pangean suture zone. 

Abstract The crust and upper mantle beneath the New England Appalachians exhibit a large offset of the Moho across the boundary between Laurentia and accreted terranes and several dipping discontinuities, which reflect Paleozoic or younger tectonic movements. We apply scattered wavefield migration to the SEISConn array deployed across northern Connecticut and obtain insights not previously available from receiver function studies. We resolve a doubled Moho at a previously imaged Moho offset, which may reflect westward thrusting of rifted Grenville crust. The migration image suggests laterally variable velocity contrasts across the Moho, perhaps reflecting mafic underplating during continental rifting. A west‐dipping feature in the lithospheric mantle is further constrained to have a slab‐like geometry, representing a relict slab subducted during an Appalachian orogenic event. Localized low seismic velocities in the upper mantle beneath the eastern portion of the array may indicate that the Northern Appalachian Anomaly extends relatively far to the south. 

Abstract Southern New England exhibits diverse geologic features resulting from past tectonic events. These include Proterozoic and early Paleozoic Laurentian units in the west, several Gondwana‐derived terranes that accreted during the Paleozoic in the east, and the Mesozoic Hartford Basin in the central part of the region. The Seismic Experiment for Imaging Structure beneath Connecticut (SEISConn) project involved the deployment of a dense array of 15 broadband seismometers across northern Connecticut to investigate the architecture of lithospheric structures beneath this region and interpret how they were created and modified by past tectonic events in the context of surface geology. We carried out P‐to‐S receiver function analysis on SEISConn data, including both single‐station analysis and common conversion point (CCP) stacking. Our images show that the westernmost part of Connecticut has a much deeper Moho than central and eastern Connecticut. The lateral transition is a well‐defined, ∼15 km step‐like offset of the Moho over a ∼20 km horizontal distance. The Moho step appears near the surface boundary between the Laurentian margin and the Gondwana‐derived Moretown terrane. Possible models for its formation include Ordovician underthrusting of Laurentia and/or modification by younger tectonic events. Other prominent features include a strong positive velocity gradient (PVG) beneath the Hartford basin corresponding to the bottom of the sedimentary units, several west‐dipping PVGs in the crust and mantle lithosphere that may correspond to relict slabs or shear zones from past subduction episodes, and a negative velocity gradient (NVG) that may correspond to the base of the lithosphere.